You can sort this with macros, but it really isn’t worth it:
int main(){
WITH(Data.attribute[i].ref->value[i]->member,
.val1 = 3,
.val2 = 2,
.val3 = 3
);
return 0;
}
Where a macro is WITH()defined as a variable macro that uses argument counting :
MACRO_CONCAT(_WITH,PP_NARG(__VA_ARGS__))(prefix, __VA_ARGS__);\
} while (0)
PP_NARG_(__VA_ARGS__,PP_RSEQ_N())
PP_ARG_N(__VA_ARGS__)
_1, _2, _3, _4, _5, _6, _7, _8, _9,_10, \
_11,_12,_13,_14,_15,_16,_17,_18,_19,_20, \
_21,_22,_23,_24,_25,_26,_27,_28,_29,_30, \
_31,_32,_33,_34,_35,_36,_37,_38,_39,_40, \
_41,_42,_43,_44,_45,_46,_47,_48,_49,_50, \
_51,_52,_53,_54,_55,_56,_57,_58,_59,_60, \
_61,_62,_63,N,...) N
63,62,61,60, \
59,58,57,56,55,54,53,52,51,50, \
49,48,47,46,45,44,43,42,41,40, \
39,38,37,36,35,34,33,32,31,30, \
29,28,27,26,25,24,23,22,21,20, \
19,18,17,16,15,14,13,12,11,10, \
9,8,7,6,5,4,3,2,1,0
Check macro expansion results with gcc -E:
int main(){
do {
Data.attribute[i].ref->value[i]->member.val1 = 3;
Data.attribute[i].ref->value[i]->member.val2 = 2;
Data.attribute[i].ref->value[i]->member.val3 = 3;
} while (0);
return 0;
}
, , ( Member_t) gcc-4.3 ( clang, ):
type, \
MACRO_CONCAT(__with_local, __COUNTER__), \
prefix, \
__VA_ARGS__ \
)
type local = prefix;\
MACRO_CONCAT(_WITH,PP_NARG(__VA_ARGS__))(local, __VA_ARGS__);\
} while(0)
int main(){
WITH_LOCAL(Member_t *, &(Data.attribute[i].ref->value[i]->member),
->val1 = 3,
->val2 = 2,
->val3 = 3
);
return 0;
}
:
int main() {
do {
Member_t * __with_local0 = &(Data.attribute[i].ref->value[i]->member);
__with_local0->val1 = 3;
__with_local0->val2 = 2;
__with_local0->val3 = 3;
} while(0);
return 0;
}