Geek asks and answers

MongoLab vs Azure Table

Take a 100 gb database for this example:

Azure storage cost: £ 6.05 / m MongoLab on AWS with 1 node cost: £ 153.18 / m

Am I missing something? Calculated something wrong? Can someone clarify the situation for me here? I would prefer to use MongoLab as I really like node / mongoDB. But this is a much more economical storage solution for table storage.

I know the differences between the Key / Value repository and the Document repository and prefer the latter.

+5
source share
1 answer

, Azure (ATS) . CRUD. Azure, ATS - . , ( ) , 7 ( 100 . , ).

MongoDB (), AWS Azure ( - ), . MongoDB-as-a-Service. , ATS, / , MongoDB .. MongoDB ( - ). Azure 0,02 . 14 . x 2 30 . ( 1 , MongoDB, - ). , 14 ( , 7 / ).

MongoLab. MongoDB-as-a-Service, -, , Azure. , , , , , , , , ..

, . , , , , ATS ( , , ). MongoDB . , , MongoDB "". , , , , + , , , (200 ) .

, ...

+12

More articles:


All Articles