This is my first time to hear about LINQ, and I have no idea about it. Please, be careful.
I have this dataset.
+---------+--------+---------------+
| RadioID | NodeID | SourceRadioID |
+---------+--------+---------------+
| R0 | 1 | |
| R1 | 1 | |
| R2 | 1 | |
| R3 | 1 | |
| R4 | 1 | |
| R5 | 2 | |
| R6 | 2 | |
| R7 | 2 | R0 |
| R8 | 2 | |
| R9 | 2 | |
| R10 | 11 | |
| R11 | 11 | R9 |
| R12 | 11 | |
| R13 | 11 | |
+---------+--------+---------------+
I need to write a method that returns a list NodeID. For instance,
List<int> dependentNode = GetChildNode(1);
My expected results: NodeID: 2 and 11.
NodeID = 2included because there is RadioID = R7which is associated with RadioID = R0which belongs NodeID = 1.
NodeID = 11also included because it is RadioID = R11connected to Radio = R9which belongs to NodeID = 2(which is also connected to NodeID = 1).
I look through this article but always get StackOverFlowException
Here is the full code:
public class RadioEntity
{
public string RadioID { get; set; }
public int NodeID { get; set; }
public string SourceRadioID { get; set; }
}
public class SampleDemo
{
public void SampleMethod()
{
Func<int, int,List<int>> GetChildNode = null;
GetChildNode = (x, y) =>
{
return (from _x in GetRadio()
where (GetRadio().Where(i => i.NodeID == x).Select(i => i.RadioID)).Contains(_x.RadioID)
from _y in new[] { _x.NodeID }.Union(GetChildNode(_x.NodeID, y + 1))
select _y).ToList<int>();
};
var _res = GetChildNode(1, 0);
}
public List<RadioEntity> GetRadio()
{
List<RadioEntity> _returnVal = new List<RadioEntity>();
_returnVal.Add(new RadioEntity() { RadioID = "R0", NodeID = 1, SourceRadioID = "" });
_returnVal.Add(new RadioEntity() { RadioID = "R1", NodeID = 1, SourceRadioID = "" });
_returnVal.Add(new RadioEntity() { RadioID = "R2", NodeID = 1, SourceRadioID = "" });
_returnVal.Add(new RadioEntity() { RadioID = "R3", NodeID = 1, SourceRadioID = "" });
_returnVal.Add(new RadioEntity() { RadioID = "R4", NodeID = 1, SourceRadioID = "" });
_returnVal.Add(new RadioEntity() { RadioID = "R5", NodeID = 2, SourceRadioID = "" });
_returnVal.Add(new RadioEntity() { RadioID = "R6", NodeID = 2, SourceRadioID = "" });
_returnVal.Add(new RadioEntity() { RadioID = "R7", NodeID = 2, SourceRadioID = "R0" });
_returnVal.Add(new RadioEntity() { RadioID = "R8", NodeID = 2, SourceRadioID = "" });
_returnVal.Add(new RadioEntity() { RadioID = "R9", NodeID = 2, SourceRadioID = "" });
_returnVal.Add(new RadioEntity() { RadioID = "R10", NodeID = 11, SourceRadioID = "" });
_returnVal.Add(new RadioEntity() { RadioID = "R11", NodeID = 11, SourceRadioID = "R9" });
_returnVal.Add(new RadioEntity() { RadioID = "R12", NodeID = 11, SourceRadioID = "" });
_returnVal.Add(new RadioEntity() { RadioID = "R13", NodeID = 11, SourceRadioID = "" });
return _returnVal;
}
}
You can suggest if there is a much better way to do this. Sorry, newbie here.