Geek asks and answers

Haxe vs. Lua in creating an application for heavy traffic

After spending a couple of hours reading on Lua and Haxe, I still don’t know which one is better for developing a web application with heavy traffic.

Which one will give us better server performance if our web application runs on the server side? We also want to keep server resources at a minimum so as not to suffer from severe delays.

Our first thought was to use Java / Spring / Hibernate, but we read about how it quickly depletes server resources as its use grows, so we are trying to find an architecture that would allow us to handle heavy traffic and let it work efficiently on the server side .

Due to the intense traffic, we are talking about more than 500 users at the same time requesting data from our servers.

Any suggestions outside of Lua and Haxe are also appreciated and will be taken into account.

Thanks for your time reading this. =)

+3
source share
4 answers

You can use Haxe to generate JavaScript with signatures like Node.js (here https://github.com/blackdog66/bdog-node ). It gives all the great features of Haxe on a very well thought out backend. This is my main platform.

shd

+2
source

Lua, WSAPI/Orbit, . , , (TM) LuaJit, , .

Github Kepler.

+1

, - " ".

? , ? , , 500 ?

I don’t think that more than 500 concurrent users is a big deal, and it is likely that it will slightly change which technology you choose, so you should choose the one that uses the language (or at least the paradigm) that you are good at You know, if you like Java, keep using it.

I used Lua (not Haxe); I like it, but it does not have a widespread third-party library available for other languages ​​such as Java or C ++ or C or Perl or Ruby or Python, which is a significant drawback for building web applications.

0
source

More articles:


All Articles