Geek asks and answers

Relationship between REPL, interpreter and compiler

From Wikipedia :

REPL is usually incorrectly called a translator. This is the wrong word. programming languages ​​that use compilation (including bytecode compilation) have REPLs, such as Common Lisp and Python.

From the answer to this post

Interactive interpreters use REPL. a translator is not required to have one. You can run Python, for example, in non-interactive mode (in a file) and it will not use the read-eval-print loop.

I was wondering if REPL [del] [/ del] always exists only for the interpreter? Wikipedia says REPL also exists for compiler? If so, what does it look like?

Thank you and welcome!

By means of the interpreter, I mean that it executes immediately after compilation.

+3
source share
3 answers

I'm not sure if you are asking for words that are commonly used or something else.

In any case, REPL is a Read Read Eval Print Loop (see first letters). If you have an interpreter that does not read your program or does not evaluate it (ie, "Understands" what you want to do and what to do) or does not print the results anywhere, what good?

If you had not seen anything, and he would not have heard you, he would not have done what you want, or you had only one attempt, and you could have put a stone on the table instead of a computer.

, : " , , ?" :-) " , ?". , .

, - , . , , , (, ..), .

, 1 ?

, REPL ?

, "". , ( ) ", , ", . , ?

, REPL ? , ?

, . LISP . , , , , , , , .

Java , VM, , - , , .

/ , - .

+3

, , ,

  • JavaScript IE 6.0 REPL.

  • REPL , , . , , , , . , .

+1

REPL Read-Eval-Print-Loop. , eval - , , , (, - , , - , , -). - - , .

+1

More articles:


All Articles