There are two things that I do not understand about this function :
1. When used in the format SUNFUNCS_RET_TIMESTAMP is not taken into account. For example, if I use the SUNFUNCS_RET_STRING format and use this code:
$lat = 46.055556; // Latitude (Ljubljana).
$long = 14.508333; // Longitude (Ljubljana).
$offset = 2; // Difference between GMT and local time in hours.
$zenith = 90 + 50 / 60;
echo "<br><p>Sunrise: " . date_sunrise(time(), SUNFUNCS_RET_STRING, $lat, $long, $zenith, $offset);
echo "<br>Sunset: " . date_sunset(time(), SUNFUNCS_RET_STRING, $lat, $long, $zenith, $offset);
Then it will somehow display the correct answer (by what I mean, I will somehow explain at the second point):
Sunrise: 05:15 Sunset: 20:42
Now, if I use SUNFUNCS_RET_TIMESTAMP and convert it to a string representation of a date with the date () function:
$lat = 46.055556; // Latitude (Ljubljana).
$long = 14.508333; // Longitude (Ljubljana).
$offset = 2; // Difference between GMT and local time in hours.
$zenith = 90 + 50 / 60;
$dateSunRise = date_sunrise(time(), SUNFUNCS_RET_TIMESTAMP, $lat, $long, $zenith, $offset);
$dateSunSet = date_sunset(time(), SUNFUNCS_RET_TIMESTAMP, $lat, $long, $zenith, $offset);
echo "<br><p>Sunrise: " . date("H:i", $dateSunRise);
echo "<br><p>Sunrise: " . date("H:i", $dateSunSet);
I get this result:
Sunrise: 03:15 Sunrise: 18:42
I checked the timestamp, and it will probably return incorrectly, so I don’t understand, because I have the same offset as in the previous example, where I used SUNFUNCS_RET_STRING.
2. , - , , . ARSO . (, ). , () :
: 5:18 : 20:41
date_sunrise date_sunset, :
: 05:15 : 20:42
, (, , , ). , , ( GeoHack ). , . , :
- 90+ (50/60) /
, , , ?