Git on Windows files - SLOWOW compared to GitHub

We decided to host our shared Git repositories on a Windows Server share. All developers then access this resource through a VPN connection to push / pull changes.

And it works great.

But we got the suspicion that it was slower than usual, i.e. compared to GitHub - so we decided to do a little speed test and set up the same project both on the local file archive and on Github.

And the result was frightening: the Fileshare Git repository was 5-7 times slower than using GitHub.

Can anyone give me any clues who has a HUGE speed difference?

The Windows file system is located on fair Windows Server 2003, which is basically just servers as a file server, and the server is NOT busy or something like that.

All developers access this resource from Mac OSX.

+3
source share
1 answer

If by “fileshare” you mean that you are using the “ local protocol ” (ie the remote repository is in a different directory on - here is remote-disk), then this is normal: SSH or smart-http will be faster.

Against

[...] If you want to press from your laptop when you are at home, you need to install a remote drive, which can be difficult and slow compared to network access.

, , .
, .
NFS , SSH , Git .

GitHub (SSH, smart HTTP), , .

. 8 Git .

+6

All Articles