Continuous Integration Server: Hudson or Sismo?

We will consider the possibility of using a CI server in the near future.

From my reading, I found that Sismo and Hudson are available for the PHP project.

Given that we are actually using GIT and PHPUnit, what is the difference between Hudson and Sismo that we need to know in order to make the best choice for our situation?

thank

+3
source share
4 answers

Matching languages ​​is not key in your hunt for the best CI server; all functions:

  • source control
  • parallel assembly
  • trigger build
  • Notification

, Jenkins ( Hudson) . Jenkins, ( , ), . .

Bamboo, Jenkins, TeamCity CruiseControl Features, (, , Bamboo, TeamCity Cruise Control )

+5

Sismo, (PHP) PHP . java Hudson.

+3

php-integration Jenkins phpunit . .

Sismo, "" CI-, , ( - ).

+2

, , sismo.

Hudson , Java, PHP. , centOS 15 . ( ).

PHP Hudson PHPUnit, Selenium, , . Hudson , .

, , , . , ( ) , . , , 2 . , .

+1

All Articles