Possible duplicate:Hard-coded breadboard objects against a torn frame
I think that, finally, I am beginning to understand what unit tests are designed to solve, but I still have problems with the implementation of all the details. I came to the conclusion that I might need a “layout” (and I use this term easily because I’m not sure that I need an object such as Moq) to complete the task.
As an example of the problem I encountered, consider the implementation of a repository template (or similar). As I understand it now, I need (at least) tests for each of the methods of the class Add(), Get()and Remove(). This is normal, except that I want to check how the method Add()handles the links null. In this case, I would simply define a simple class in a test project and set an instance of this value nullin within the corresponding unit test?
Add()
Get()
Remove()
null
Unit Test Example (Illustration):
[TestMethod] public void TestAdd_Null() { IRepository<MockObject> repository = (IRepository<MockObject>)(new Repository<MockObject>()); MockObject testObject = null; repository.Add(testObject); Assert.IsNotNull(repository.Entity); } // I'm thinking I should implement something like this exclusively within the Test project. // Is this reasonable? Or should I be looking into something else? internal class MockObject { public String Name { get; set; } }
, The Matrix. , , . . !
, , . , , -.
Mocks , , . , . , , , . , , .
, Moq, , , , . , Entity , - ( , , , ). , .
Entity
- , , , , factory . , , . , .
, , , .